Categories: Canada

Ryan Wedding’s ‘cocaine lawyer’ facing licence suspension, restriction in Ontario


An Ontario lawyer accused by American authorities of advising a Canadian Olympian-turned-alleged-cocaine kingpin may have his licence to practice law restricted or suspended.

Deepak Paradkar, who went by several aliases, including the “cocaine lawyer,” according to the U.S. Justice Department, was arrested and charged last month in connection to Ryan Wedding’s alleged drug empire.

The 44-year-old Wedding, a snowboarder who was living in Coquitlam, B.C., when he suited up for his country at the 2002 Salt Lake City Games, was added to the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list earlier this year.

Paradkar, 62, is accused of advising Wedding to murder a key witness so that he and Andrew Clark, his reported second-in-command, would avoid extradition from Mexico on 2024 criminal charges against them.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Paradkar is also accused of providing Wedding with court documents and evidentiary materials from the criminal case they would not otherwise have access to.

Story continues below advertisement

On Jan. 31, the witness was shot five times while at a restaurant in Medellín, Colombia, and died instantly, according to an indictment unsealed last month.

The allegations against Paradkar have not been tested in court.




U.S. compares Canadian ex-Olympian to drug kingpin Pablo Escobar


The Law Society of Ontario, which regulates the profession in the province, is now looking to suspend and/or restrict Paradkar’s licence to practice law in Ontario.

“The responding party is facing very serious criminal charges in the United States of America involving conspiracy to murder a witness, conspiracy to export and distribute cocaine, and engaging in a criminal enterprise,” the society said in a motion filed with the Law Society Tribunal on Nov. 26.

“There are reasonable grounds for believing that there is a significant risk of harm to members of the public, or to the public interest in the administration of justice, if the order is not made and that making the order is likely to reduce the risk.”

Story continues below advertisement

The tribunal hearing is scheduled to be heard at 10 a.m. eastern time on Friday.


&copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.



Source link

admin2

Share
Published by
admin2

Recent Posts

A Disciplined Approach to BBB-B Credit

Barriers to entry for sophisticated asset classes like collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) are rapidly falling…

2 hours ago

Boston marathoner reflects on helping collapsed runner as video goes viral | Sport News

Aaron Beggs says video of him and Brazilian Robson De Oliveira helping an exhausted competitor…

2 hours ago

The Last XRP Wave E Resistance To Watch Before The Surge

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure XRP is…

2 hours ago

Ford government commits to passing code of conduct reform before municipal elections

Ontario’s minister of municipal affairs and housing says he will pass new code of conduct…

3 hours ago

Autism Okanagan home looted just months after it was donated to the charity – Okanagan

Just months after celebrating a major donation,  Autism Okanagan is reeling after a devastating incident.…

6 hours ago

An Interesting Corner of the High-Yield Bond Market Beckons

Investors looking for added income in the bond market — without taking on significantly more…

7 hours ago