Categories: Canada

Ryan Wedding’s ‘cocaine lawyer’ facing licence suspension, restriction in Ontario


An Ontario lawyer accused by American authorities of advising a Canadian Olympian-turned-alleged-cocaine kingpin may have his licence to practice law restricted or suspended.

Deepak Paradkar, who went by several aliases, including the “cocaine lawyer,” according to the U.S. Justice Department, was arrested and charged last month in connection to Ryan Wedding’s alleged drug empire.

The 44-year-old Wedding, a snowboarder who was living in Coquitlam, B.C., when he suited up for his country at the 2002 Salt Lake City Games, was added to the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list earlier this year.

Paradkar, 62, is accused of advising Wedding to murder a key witness so that he and Andrew Clark, his reported second-in-command, would avoid extradition from Mexico on 2024 criminal charges against them.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Paradkar is also accused of providing Wedding with court documents and evidentiary materials from the criminal case they would not otherwise have access to.

Story continues below advertisement

On Jan. 31, the witness was shot five times while at a restaurant in Medellín, Colombia, and died instantly, according to an indictment unsealed last month.

The allegations against Paradkar have not been tested in court.




U.S. compares Canadian ex-Olympian to drug kingpin Pablo Escobar


The Law Society of Ontario, which regulates the profession in the province, is now looking to suspend and/or restrict Paradkar’s licence to practice law in Ontario.

“The responding party is facing very serious criminal charges in the United States of America involving conspiracy to murder a witness, conspiracy to export and distribute cocaine, and engaging in a criminal enterprise,” the society said in a motion filed with the Law Society Tribunal on Nov. 26.

“There are reasonable grounds for believing that there is a significant risk of harm to members of the public, or to the public interest in the administration of justice, if the order is not made and that making the order is likely to reduce the risk.”

Story continues below advertisement

The tribunal hearing is scheduled to be heard at 10 a.m. eastern time on Friday.


&copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.



Source link

admin2

Share
Published by
admin2

Recent Posts

Hundreds rally in Red Deer to support teenage girl recovering from violent assault

Descrease article font size Increase article font size Rylin Brinston, 14, is battered and bruised…

3 hours ago

Seven-Week Win Streak Survives Friday Slump

The S&P 500 secured multiple record highs this week but faltered on Friday, retreating 1.2%…

4 hours ago

Iran war live: Lebanon, Israel extend truce; Tehran ready for more US talks | US-Israel war on Iran News

blinking-dotLive updatesLive updates, Lebanon’s Ministry of Health said Israeli attacks have killed 2,951 people since…

5 hours ago

Golden Knights docked 2nd-round pick, coach fined $100K for breaking media rules

Descrease article font size Increase article font size The NHL docked the Vegas Golden Knights…

6 hours ago

More Ontario stores to open on Victoria Day in move government says brings ‘flexibility’

Stores in Ontario will be open on Victoria Day for the first time since the…

9 hours ago

Emerging Markets Bonds Still Look Good Compared to Treasuries

Emerging markets bonds and the related ETFs are delivering for investors. Meanwhile, other, supposedly more…

9 hours ago